Every public claim should be read in the context of its evidence source. We use four evidence classes to prevent first-party statements from being presented as independent verification.
Examples include public app-store listings or developer profiles hosted by external platforms. These can support publication or identity claims, but not automatically prove user scale or business outcomes.
A public client website can be independently opened and inspected. Its existence does not by itself support claims about traffic, conversion, revenue or commercial impact.
Architecture pages, case studies, demos and engineering documentation are useful proof of technical thinking and implementation scope, but remain first-party material.
Some operational systems cannot expose production data, internal URLs, customer names or private architecture. Those systems are anonymised or published at a deliberately limited level.
This creates a smaller set of claims, but a more defensible one.
Public evidence can become outdated when an app-store listing changes, a client website moves, or a product status evolves. Zelvian's public registries therefore include update dates and should be corrected rather than silently preserving obsolete claims.
View Verified OutcomesReal screenshots from a Zelvian-built product, internal system or UAT environment. Sensitive fields may be obscured before publication. This evidence supports the existence and structure of the shown interface; it does not independently establish customer scale, uptime, revenue, adoption or performance.
Review Real Product Interfaces →